Wearable Health Solution for Improved Rehabilitation and Recovery.

Welcome to MIO!

November 12th 2018 in Company
doctor stretching patient's left leg

Each year, 50% of all Americans over the age of 18 will require physical therapy (PT). Yet, only about 10% of those people will take advantage of physical therapy services! This results in millions of Americans living with preventable issues that reduce their quality of life and increase the cost of healthcare.

So it wasn’t long before I decided to apply my professional knowledge of sensor technology to make physical therapy more affordable and accessible for Americans. I started MIO Therapy.

Along with my team, we worked with Stanford Healthcare, UCSF Medical Center, and Good Samaritan Hospital to build MIO Therapy. MIO Therapy is a virtual assistant for physical and occupational therapists. MIO is based on our proven wearable motion sensor technology and when accompanied with an App, the sensors calculate the range-of-motion of any major body joint with great accuracy.

A patient recovering from a wrist fracture wears the MIO sensors during a visit to a PT clinic. The sensors, combined with the MIO App, offer real-time 3D visualization of the wrist during the session.

Flexion, extension, and deviation of the wrist (in degrees), is recorded in the app for performance analysis and treatment optimization by the clinician. The MIO app also offers mini games and targeted exercises to entice patients to complete treatment and enhance the therapeutic experience.

All this is done using our MbientLab sensors, specifically the MetaMotionR board. The board is equipped with the Nordic nRF52, which boasts an ARM Cortex-M4 with a Bluetooth transceiver. This allows the sensors to simultaneously and wirelessly communicate with the MIO app. The MetaMotionR also includes the Bosch BMI160 and Bosch BMM150 sensors, a 9-axis IMU for 3D motion sensing. The Cortex-M4 runs the Bosch Sensortec FusionLib, which combines the measurements from 3-axis gyroscope, 3-axis geomagnetic sensor and a 3-axis accelerometer, to provide an absolute orientation vector. The FusionLib includes algorithms for offset calibration of each sensor, monitoring of the calibration status, and a Kalman filter to provide distortion-free and refined orientation vectors.

For our application, the magnetometer is left off in order to reduce the possibility of interference with hospital equipment and improve battery life. The output of the FusionLib without the magnetometer produces relative orientation. A one-time calibration sequence performed by the clinician before a PT session ensures the quaternion outputs of the sensors are aligned in absolute space (i.e. if they are both in the same physical orientation they produce identical outputs). For joints with more variable geometry, such as ankles and foreheads, MIO patients are required to hold a specific position while a baseline is calculated. This allows us to offset for body variability and achieve consistent results.

The live, wirelessly streamed, quaternion data is then used to animate a 3D model in the app. For each major body joint such as the wrist, two sensors are used. One sensor is placed below the joint; the second is placed above the joint. Both sensors simultaneously stream quaternion vectors to the MIO app, which performs additional calculations. The quaternion value of the lower sensor is inverted and multiplied by the upper value to produce a final quaternion representing the rotation of the joint. From here we use various Euler conversions to calculate range of motion in degrees. As a result, the MIO App can calculate the ulnar deviation of the wrist of our patient within +-1 degree of accuracy.

We can optionally add more sensors to track additional limbs and achieve more visibility.

“ So why did we build it?”

One, it lowers the cost of recovery. According to a 2018 poster presented at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Annual Meeting, patients who participated in virtual physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty had significantly lowered health care costs. 287 patients completed the trial, with 143 patients receiving virtual physical therapy and 144 receiving standard care. At 12-weeks post-discharge, patients who underwent virtual physical therapy had a mean cost reduction of $2,745. Researchers noted that the cost difference was due to a higher number of urgent care and emergency room visits, as well as more inpatient post-acute care stays, in the 144 patients receiving standard care.

Two, how do you decide which therapist and PT facility is right for you? You ask a friend. You get a referral from a doctor. If you are desperate, you Google ‘PT clinics near me’. What if there was a place that could give you concrete rankings of your local PT facilities? That’s what we aim to do with MIO. Today there is too much inconsistency in the quality of care from one therapist to the next. We want to give patients and PTs the tools to make the right decision when making judgements about someone’s recovery plan and progress. MIO aims to standardize therapy.

So as we embark on this journey, I invite you to think back to a time when physical therapists were a group of women called “reconstruction aides” working to treat the wounded on the battlefields of World War 1. We have come a long way; the physical therapy profession requires a Master of Science (doctoral) degree and therapists are licensed to treat everything from vertigo to tendonitis.

We launched this week and we invite everyone to join us as we take PT into the digital age. We hope you will share this story with your friends, family, and colleagues. Please visit our website: wwww.miotherapy.com.

Thank you,
-Laura Kassovic, CEO of MIO Therapy